[News Update] CLARITY Act Advances: What Banks Need To Know About Stablecoin Regulation

fedwire iso 20022 timeline

The U.S. Senate Banking Committee has taken a significant step toward establishing a comprehensive regulatory framework for digital assets by advancing the Digital Asset Market Clarity (CLARITY) Act with bipartisan support (Senate Banking Committee). While the legislation still faces additional votes before becoming law, its progress signals continued momentum toward clearer rules for digital assets and stablecoins in the U.S.

What Is the CLARITY Act?

The CLARITY Act is proposed U.S. legislation that would establish a comprehensive regulatory framework for digital assets, bringing greater clarity to how stablecoins and other digital assets are regulated and fit within the broader U.S. financial system. 

One of the most closely watched developments is a compromise on stablecoin rewards. In simple terms, the revised language means that if someone is just holding stablecoins in an account without using them, they cannot earn interest or passive returns on that balance—similar to how a savings account earns interest. However, rewards are still allowed if they are tied to actual activity, such as making payments, completing transactions, or participating in loyalty programs. Regulators are also directed to issue guidance within one year clarifying where activity-based rewards end and prohibited interest begins (Galaxy Digital Research). 

Why It Matters to Financial Institutions

For financial institutions, the immediate impact is less about stablecoin rewards themselves and more about regulatory certainty—particularly as digital assets begin to intersect more directly with core payments infrastructure.

For years, uncertainty around digital asset regulation has slowed adoption and complicated strategic planning. The CLARITY Act helps define how digital asset activities will be supervised, how responsibilities will be divided among regulators, and how stablecoins can coexist alongside traditional banking products.

The compromise also reflects how policymakers are seeking to encourage innovation in digital payments without allowing stablecoins to function as interest-earning deposit accounts. As stablecoins increasingly resemble payment instruments rather than speculative assets, financial institutions must consider how these instruments could be integrated into existing payment ecosystems—particularly within unified payments hubs that orchestrate multiple payment rails, formats, and settlement mechanisms.

What Financial Institutions Should Consider

Although the legislation is still working its way through Congress, institutions should begin evaluating how regulated digital money could fit into their long-term payments strategy and infrastructure modernization efforts.

Areas worth monitoring include:

  • How future guidance distinguishes allowed rewards from prohibited interest, and how that affects product design and customer offerings.
  • The evolving role of stablecoins in domestic and cross-border payments, particularly as an additional rail alongside ACH, the RTP® network, the FedNow® Service, and card networks.
  • How unified payments hubs can be extended to support digital asset transactions, enabling orchestration, routing, and settlement across both traditional and emerging payment types.
  • Compliance implications, transaction monitoring, and reporting requirements for stablecoin-based payments within existing regulatory frameworks.
  • Potential impacts on customer expectations for faster, programmable, and always-available digital payments.

Banks and credit unions need to be aware that digital assets are steadily moving into the regulated financial ecosystem rather than operating outside of it. This will require tighter alignment between payments operations, compliance functions, and technology platforms.

Looking Ahead

The CLARITY Act still requires approval by the full Senate and reconciliation with House legislation before becoming law. Additional amendments are also possible as the legislative process continues.

Regardless of the final language, we can see that policymakers are moving toward a framework that supports innovation while maintaining consumer protections and preserving distinctions between regulated bank deposits and digital payment instruments.

For financial institutions, this reinforces the importance of building flexible, future-ready payments infrastructure—such as unified payments hubs—that can adapt to new payment types while maintaining strong compliance and governance controls.

Just learning about stablecoins? Learn more in Stablecoin 101: Empowering Banks and Credit Unions



Alacriti’s centralized payment platform,
Orbipay Payments Hub, provides innovation opportunities and the ability to make smart routing decisions at the financial institution to meet their individual needs. Financial institutions can take full ownership of their payments and control their evolution with TCH’s RTP® network, the FedNow® Service, Zelle®, Fedwire, ACH, and Visa Direct, all on one cloud-based platform. To speak with an Alacriti payments expert, please contact us at info@alacriti.com.

Mayrise De La Torre

Partner & Product Marketing Leader | B2B Strategy Expert

Mayrise De La Torre is a seasoned marketing leader with over 17 years of experience driving growth and innovation across the technology, insurance, and healthcare sectors. Currently serving as Partner & Product Marketing Manager at Alacriti, Mayrise is passionate about bridging the gap between product innovation and customer engagement, with a focus on fintech, digital transformation, and strategic partnerships.

Related Assets

Solving Payment Fragmentation for Banks and Credit Unions

Zelle® vs. Wire Transfer

fedwire iso 20022 timeline

[News Update] CFPB Revises Section 1071 Rule: What Financial Institutions Need To Know

Scroll to Top